Built-environment albedo enhancement (white roofs etc.)

Industry

The built environment takes up an ever greater portion of the earth’s surface. This mostly unused surface area could be coated in albedo enhancing paints or material which would allow them to reflect incoming sunlight.

Analysis overview

Technological Readiness Level (TRL) 3
Scalability 1
Timeliness for near-future effects 3
Northern + Arctic potential 1
Global potential 2
Cost - benefit 1
Environmental risks 3
Community impacts 3
Ease of reversibility 3
Risk of termination shock 3
Legality/governance 3
Scientific/media attention 2

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

High 3

In many warm regions of the world it has been a longstanding custom to paint buildings white. Although certain paints or new to develop coatings might be extra efficient (See passive radiative cooling) the technology basically already exists.

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

A technology with a TRL of 7-9: TRL 7 – prototype demonstrated; TRL 8 – system complete; TRL 9 – system proven

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Scalability

Low 1

There have been several major experiments to increase albedo over land, most infamously the attempt by Eduardo Gold, who received $200,000 to paint a mountain white in the Peruvian Andes. However, this specific measure is limited to the built environment. This means there is only a limited surface area. Moreover, although the technology already exists NASEM (2015) points to the large costs related to painting and maintenance.

Scalability

Physically unable to scale; sub-linear/logarithmic efficiency of scalability

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Timeliness for near-future effects

High 3

Timeliness for near-future effects

Implemented in time to make a significant difference

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Northern + Arctic potential

Low 1

If all urban areas would be modified, Irivine et al (2011) found that this could lead to a 13% increase in minimum sea-ice cover. Generally though, this measure is mainly considered as effective when applied at a local scale (IPCC AR6 wg 1, 2021, chapter 4), and holds particular potential to reduce the urban heat island effect (Jacobson and Ten Hoeve, 2011). However, this would mainly be so in densely populated low latitude areas, and would be ineffective in the Arctic (Smoliak et al 2022). Moreover, since the northern regions face very cold winters, such measures might lead to increased heating requirements, and such measures should therefore be carefully considered in the North (Bright et al, 2015).

Northern + Arctic potential

No noticeable extra positive effect beyond the global average; technology is unsuited to the Arctic

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Global potential

Medium 2

There is general agreement that this measure would be ineffective as a measure to counter the effects of climate change on a global scale (NASEM, 2015; Lawrence et al, 2018; IPCC AR6 wg 1, 2021, chapter 4). The IPCC 2021 AR6 wg 1 report gives a global mean forcing effect of less than 0.5 W m–2 (chapter 4), and some studies see even a global net warming effect of the painting of urban roofs (Jacobson and Ten Hoeve, 2011).

Global potential

Statistically detectable impacts

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Cost - benefit

High 1

The costs to paint and maintain a white coat of urban areas is considered to be very high, and relatively very expensive when considering the potential effect (NASEM, 2015).

Cost - benefit

Cost of investment comparable to cost of avoided damage

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Environmental risks

Low 3

Lawrence et al. (2018) note in their literature review that this measure might be very invasive and lead to many regional side effects.

Environmental risks

Very limited, site-specific effects restricted to the solution deployment location only

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Community impacts

Beneficial 3

Summer temperature extremes are increasingly problematic in urban areas, and this measure might thereby significantly help local communities.

Community impacts

Significant benefits to communities

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Ease of reversibility

Easy 3

NASEM (2015) considers this measure to be of 'low overall risk, and ‘easily reversible', although the painting over of white surfaces would require another major investment.

Ease of reversibility

Easily reversible naturally

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Risk of termination shock

Low 3

Although all SRM measures will lead to warming once it is halted, paints and similar reflective surfaces are likely to be effective for a long time, and will therefore not hold the risk of causing an abrupt warming.///

Risk of termination shock

Low or insignificant termination shock or damage

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Legality/governance

High 3

It is likely that nation states could implement such measures on their own territory.

Legality/governance

Currently legal to deploy, with governance structures in place to facilitate it and/or financial incentives to develop it

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

Scientific/media attention

Medium 2

There is a general lack of discussion of this measure as a major climate action (Lawrence et al, 2018), although there seems to be quite some interest in it from local urban planners.

Scientific/media attention

Some attention within the scientific community, including published research and funding programmes; some media attention; some commercial interest

Read more about the Methodology 🡥

References

Bright, R. M., Zhao, K., Jackson, R. B., & Cherubini, F. (2015). Quantifying surface albedo and other direct biogeophysical climate forcings of forestry activities. Global Change Biology, 21(9), 3246-3266. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12951

Irvine, P. J., Ridgwell, A., & Lunt, D. J. (2011). Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 116(D24). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016281

Jacobson, M. Z., & Ten Hoeve, J. E. (2012). Effects of urban surfaces and white roofs on global and regional climate. Journal of climate, 25(3), 1028-1044. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00032.1

Lawrence, M.G., Schäfer, S., Muri, H. et al. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nat Commun 9, 3734 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18988.

Smoliak, B.V. et al 2022, Mapping potential surface contributions to reflected solar radiation Environ. Res. Commun. 4 065003. Environ. Res. Commun. 4 (2022) 065003 https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac7a25

Related ideas

Alternating layers of limestone and dolomite, Eleonore Bay, Northeast Greenland National Park

Industry

Atmospheric methane capture by zeolites

Zeolites are porous minerals that can capture methane (Jackson 2019).

Nuclear icebreaker "Taymyr" operating in sea ice North of Dickson, Taymyr, Russia

Sea ice & icebergs

Sea ice breakup in winter

Sea ice can be an effective insulator between colder winter air and the warmer ocean below, thereby reducing the potential dissipation of heat into space.

Oceans & marine

Promoting ocean calcifiers to sequester atmospheric carbon

Biotic processes play an important role in oceanic carbon uptake, with most attention going to carbon-consuming photosynthesising organisms. Moore et al. (2023) argue that the potential role of shellfish and other calcifiers in carbon sequestration is significantly overlooked in the CDR literature.

Industry

Arctic methane capture and usage

Some have suggested that it might be possible to capture methane or methane hydrates and transform it into useful materials.

Sea ice melting, North of Dickson, Taymyr, Russia

Sea ice & icebergs

Pykrete usage

Pykrete is a 6:1 mix of ice and sawdust that has the property of melting slower than regular ice. Several references have been made online to the use of pykrete as an artificial barrier, as artificial sea ice, or as blockers of moulins.

Land-based measures

Afforestation, reforestation and forest management

Although the rate of deforestation has slowed over the last few decades, the world is still losing forest cover (FAO 2020). Adequate management, protection, and restoration of existing forests, and the planting of unforested areas, play a crucial role in climate mitigation scenarios (IPCC AR6 WG3), and many countries now include forests in their climate mitigation targets (NDCs).The Northern and Arctic regions are essential in this endeavor since they are home to large swaths of boreal forests that make up 27% of total global forest area (FAO 2020).

Atmosphere / solar radiation

Mixed phase regime cloud thinning over the polar oceans during winter

Clouds play an important role in the Earth’s energy system. The effects of clouds are complex and diverse, often having simultaneous cooling and warming effects. Mixed-phase clouds (MPC) are clouds that contain water vapor, ice particles, and supercooled water droplets. MPCs are still poorly understood and 'notoriously difficult to represent in numerical weather prediction and climate models' (Korolev et al. 2017).

Blueberries (Vaccinium myrtillus) as part of the vegetation 5 years after forest fire, Mykland, Aust Agder, Norway

Land-based measures

Rewilding

Natural climate solutions like conservation or restoration can significantly contribute to climate change mitigation efforts (Griscom et al. 2017). One such category of natural climate solutions is re-wilding.