Ice shields and “volcanoes”
Arctic sea ice extent has rapidly decreased over the last few decades, with most multi-year ice disappearing altogether. This has already had major effects on local communities and ecosystems. The disappearance of the relatively reflective sea ice also leads to a dramatic decrease of albedo in the Arctic and subsequent high energy uptakes by the darker water during the Arctic summers.
Similar to other ideas to pump water on sea ice (see Sea ice thickening), engineer Sev Clarke (Planetary Restoration n.d.) and engineering student Katy Cartlidge (University of Cambridge 2022) both came up with designs to artificially produce sea ice. In both schemes, water is pumped up through a central pipe and allowed to freeze onto previously-grown ice. This ongoing process then slowly forms a thicker mass of ice that would hopefully be able to survive over longer periods. Many of these 'icebergs', which Clarke calls Ice Shields and Cartlidge dubbed ice volcanoes, could together form larger surface areas that could have multiple benefits for ecosystems and the climate.
Analysis overview
Technological Readiness Level (TRL)
Low 1
Technological Readiness Level (TRL)
A technology with a TRL of 1-3: TRL 1 – Basic; TRL 2 – Concept formulated; TRL 3 – Experimental proof of concept
Scalability
Low 1
Scalability
Physically unable to scale; sub-linear/logarithmic efficiency of scalability
Timeliness for near-future effects
Low 1
Timeliness for near-future effects
Implemented too late to make a significant difference
Northern + Arctic potential
Low 1
Northern + Arctic potential
No noticeable extra positive effect beyond the global average; technology is unsuited to the Arctic
Global potential
Low 1
Global potential
Insignificant to be detected at a global scale
Cost - benefit
Medium 2
Hao et al (2023) estimate that the melting of the sea ice would in any case costs the world an average of 6.7–13.3 trillion USD annually over the period 2020 to 2100, when the costs of the forcing effects of the ice are calculated in terms of equivalent costs of the forcing that is the result of GHG emissions.
Cost - benefit
Significant investment costs needed, but still much cheaper than the avoided damage costs (e.g., 30%).
Environmental risks
Medium 2
Environmental risks
More widespread and possibly regional impacts that extend beyond the immediate solution deployment location
Community impacts
Unknown 0
Ease of reversibility
Medium 2
Ease of reversibility
Possible with significant investment
Risk of termination shock
Medium 2
Risk of termination shock
Medium or relatively significant termination shock or damage
Legality/governance
Medium 2
Legality/governance
Fits within existing structures to a certain degree, but some policy changes are needed to deploy at scale
Scientific/media attention
Medium 2
Scientific/media attention
Some attention within the scientific community, including published research and funding programmes; some media attention; some commercial interest
References
Clarke, S. n.d. Planetary Restoration blog: #4 Ice Shield/Ice Thickening. https://planetaryrestoration.net/f/sev-clarke-more-climate-solutions [Accessed 9 July 2024]
Hao H., Su B., Liu S., and Zhuo W. 2023. Radiative Effects and Costing Assessment of Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Changes. Remote Sensing. 15(4):970. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15040970
University of Cambridge. 4 Oct. 2022. Undergraduate project: Can an 'ice volcano' help to regenerate sea ice? Dept. of Eng. News. http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/news/undergraduate-project-can-ice-volcano-help-regenerate-sea-ice?s=03 [Accessed 9 July 2024]