Log in to submit feedback for this text Feedback pencil

Polar chimneys

Icebergs in the sea

Irregularly shaped icebergs are common around Greenland and Northern Canada and originate from the many Greenland fjords.

Year: 2015


Photographer: Peter Prokosch

References

Some have suggested modifying incoming and outgoing radiation budgets in the Arctic to mitigate the warming in the region.

Bonenelle and de Richter (2010) and Ming et al. (2014) describe a polar chimney built on the Arctic coasts alligning mountains, like Alaska or Norway. The system consists of a large tower leaning against the relief that sucks in cold polar air, coupled with a heat exchanger at the bottom that reacts with the relatively warm waters of the gulf stream. In two heat exchange processes this system would generate energy, whilst also helping sea ice formation and cooling down seawater. Moreover, in Ming et al. (2014) description, an addition would encourage snowfall and thereby 'increase polar albedo'.

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

Low 1

This has only been referred to in a few isolated studies.

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

A technology with a TRL of 1-3: TRL 1 – Basic; TRL 2 – Concept formulated; TRL 3 – Experimental proof of concept

Scalability

Low 1

0

Scalability

Physically unable to scale; sub-linear/logarithmic efficiency of scalability

Timeliness for near-future effects

Low 1

0

Timeliness for near-future effects

Implemented too late to make a significant difference

Northern + Arctic potential

Low 1

It is specifically thought out to be built in the Arctic.

Northern + Arctic potential

No noticeable extra positive effect beyond the global average; technology is unsuited to the Arctic

Global potential

Low 1

0

Global potential

Insignificant to be detected at a global scale

Cost - benefit

Unknown 0

0

Environmental risks

Unknown 0

0

Community impacts

Beneficial 3

If this technology could indeed generate electricity this would be beneficial to local communities.

Community impacts

Significant benefits to communities

Ease of reversibility

Unknown 0

0

Risk of termination shock

Low 3

0

Risk of termination shock

Low or insignificant termination shock or damage

Legality/governance

High 3

0

Legality/governance

Currently legal to deploy, with governance structures in place to facilitate it and/or financial incentives to develop it

Scientific/media attention

Low 1

This has only been referred to in a few isolated studies.

Scientific/media attention

Very low attention from individuals and/or abandoned ideas; low media attention; no commercial interest.

References

Bonnelle, D. (2003). Vent Artificiel, “Tall is Beautiful”: examen des perspectives de gains de rentabilité d'une énergie renouvelable déjà presque rentable. Ed. du Cosmogone. Lyon. 79pp.

D. Bonnelle, R.K. de Richter. (2010). 21 énergies renouvelables insolites pour le 21ème siècle. France: Ellipses. 173pp.

Ming, T., Liu, W., & Caillol, S. (2014). Fighting global warming by climate engineering: Is the Earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 31: 792-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.032

Related ideas