Log in to submit feedback for this text Feedback pencil

Enhancing permafrost refreezing with air pipes

Polygon Tundra, Lena Delta

Polygon Lakes in the Arctic Tundra are unique to permafrost areas and form as a result of the freeze-thaw cycle that occurs here.

Year: 2015


Photographer: Peter Prokosch

References

Thermosyphon technologies that passively cool soils if the air temperature is colder than surface temperatures have been used on a smaller scale to stabilize permafrost that supports infrastructure (Xu and Goering, 2008).

The largest example of thermosyphon usage is the Trans Alaska Pipeline which uses such systems along its 1300 km track. There have been some isolated online suggestions to use such a technology on a larger scale to stabilize Northern permafrost. Similarly, there has been a suggestion to use passive air cooling with large ceramic half-pipes built into the permafrost (https://klinkmansolar.com/kfrozen.htm).

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

Low 1

Thermosyphon technologies are already in use, and combining them with renewable energy systems might make their cooling far more efficient (Wagner et al, 2021; Zueter and Sasmito, 2023). However, these have been only used to preserve the human built environment, and it is unclear how this would work on a larger scale.

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

A technology with a TRL of 1-3: TRL 1 – Basic; TRL 2 – Concept formulated; TRL 3 – Experimental proof of concept

Scalability

Low 1

This measure would require massive areas to be effective.

Scalability

Physically unable to scale; sub-linear/logarithmic efficiency of scalability

Timeliness for near-future effects

Low 1

0

Timeliness for near-future effects

Implemented too late to make a significant difference

Northern + Arctic potential

Low 1

This measure would require massive areas to be effective.

Northern + Arctic potential

No noticeable extra positive effect beyond the global average; technology is unsuited to the Arctic

Global potential

Low 1

0

Global potential

Insignificant to be detected at a global scale

Cost - benefit

High 1

Installing and maintaining such systems would likely come at significant cost.

Cost - benefit

Cost of investment comparable to cost of avoided damage

Environmental risks

Unknown 0

0

Community impacts

Unknown 0

0

Ease of reversibility

Hard 1

The systems could perhaps be physically removed, albeit likely at great costs.

Ease of reversibility

Impossible or very difficult to reverse

Risk of termination shock

Low 3

0

Risk of termination shock

Low or insignificant termination shock or damage

Legality/governance

High 3

It is likely that nation states could implement such measures on their own territory.

Legality/governance

Currently legal to deploy, with governance structures in place to facilitate it and/or financial incentives to develop it

Scientific/media attention

Low 1

Passive cooling systems for permafrost have only been hinted at, and not seriously explored.

Scientific/media attention

Very low attention from individuals and/or abandoned ideas; low media attention; no commercial interest.

References

Wagner, A. M., Maakestad, J. B., Yarmak, E., & Douglas, T. A. (2021). Artificial ground freezing using solar-powered thermosyphons. US Army Corps of Engineers. Washington, DC. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1153377.pdf [Accessed 19 July 2024]

Xu, J., & Goering, D. J. (2008). Experimental validation of passive permafrost cooling systems. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 53(3), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.09.002

Zueter, A. F., & Sasmito, A. P. (2023). Cold energy storage as a solution for year-round renewable artificial ground freezing: Case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Project. Renewable Energy, 203, 664-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.093 

Related ideas