Methane flaring (not industrial)

Industry

High Arctic Tundra, Northern Taymyr, Russia July 1990

Methane is a highly potent greenhouse gas and its reduction is given ever greater priority in international emission reduction policies. Given the increasing, and potentially catastrophic rate of methane release from the thawing Arctic and Northern permafrost, these regions are crucial in this endeavor. Apart from the methane release from microbial activity in thawing permafrost on land, methane also escapes in the form of hydrates which have been formed under sediments beneath the sea.

Apart from proposals to destroy atmospheric methane or capturing it, some have suggested it could be possible to prevent methane from reaching the atmosphere or flaring it. Sellers (2011) noted that it could be possible to cover a certain subsea area and, instead of trying to capture the hydrates, flaring them, thereby turning the methane into relatively less potent GHG CO2. Lockley (2012) also writes about ‘Small, inexpensive spark devices can ignite combustible methane/air mixtures at source’. Paul Klinkman equally writes about 'Compact wind-powered sparking devices with small batteries' to flare methane at source. Alternatively, Stolaroff et al. (2012) and Lockley (2012) suggested ideas to disturb the methane bubbles while they traveled through the water column, thereby making it less likely for them to reach the surface and enter into the atmosphere.

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

Low 1

There has not been major scientific interest in the idea, as major difficulties arise from non-point source emissions mitigation (Johannisson, and Hiete, 2020). Small scale experiments with capturing and flaring methane using recycled parachutes is done by the company Frost Methane (https://www.frostmethane.com/, see Catalog of Research Funding Needs to Advance Methane Removal (2023) at methaneaction.org). Methane flaring development is also part of the US Reducing Emissions of Methane Every Day of the Year (REMEDY) program (arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-media/press-releases/us-department-energy-awards-35-million-technologies-reduce-methane). Ming et al (2022) however argue that such ideas remain speculative without concrete details.

Technological Readiness Level (TRL)

A technology with a TRL of 1-3: TRL 1 – Basic; TRL 2 – Concept formulated; TRL 3 – Experimental proof of concept

Scalability

Low 1

It might be that certain measures could be able to capture methane or hydrates from concentrated sources, although given the huge surface area and logistical difficulties, Stolaroff et al, (2012) write that 'Few of the known mitigation measures appear applicable to large-scale aqueous sources.'

Scalability

Physically unable to scale; sub-linear/logarithmic efficiency of scalability

Timeliness for near-future effects

Unknown 0

Northern + Arctic potential

Unknown 0

Global potential

Unknown 0

Cost - benefit

Unknown 0

Environmental risks

Unknown 0

Community impacts

Unknown 0

Ease of reversibility

Unknown 0

Risk of termination shock

Low 3

Risk of termination shock

Low or insignificant termination shock or damage

Legality/governance

High 3

It is likely that nation states could implement such measures on their own territory.

Legality/governance

Currently legal to deploy, with governance structures in place to facilitate it and/or financial incentives to develop it

Scientific/media attention

Low 1

Apart from a few studies, there has been relatively little attention for this measure.

Scientific/media attention

Very low attention from individuals and/or abandoned ideas; low media attention; no commercial interest.

References

Johannisson, J., & Hiete, M. (2020). A structured approach for the mitigation of natural methane emissions—lessons learned from anthropogenic emissions. C, 6(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/c6020024

Lockley, A. (2012). Comment on “Review of methane mitigation technologies with application to rapid release of methane from the Arctic”. Environmental science & technology, 46(24), 13552-13553. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303074j

Ming, T., Li, W., Yuan, Q., Davies, P., De Richter, R., Peng, C., ... & Zhou, N. (2022). Perspectives on removal of atmospheric methane. Advances in Applied Energy, 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100085

Salter, S. H. (2011). Can we capture methane from the Arctic seabed? Retrieved April 6, 2018. Available at: http://arctic-news.blogspot.co.uk/p/methane-capture.html [Accessed 22 July 2024]

Stolaroff, J. K., Bhattacharyya, S., Smith, C. A., Bourcier, W. L., Cameron-Smith, P. J., & Aines, R. D. (2012). Review of methane mitigation technologies with application to rapid release of methane from the Arctic. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(12), 6455-6469. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204686w

Related ideas

Ice sheets and glaciers

Increasing glacier thickness by local artificial snow production

Up to 50% of the world’s glaciers are set to disappear this century, with many more at risk if emission reduction targets are not met (Rounce et al. 2023).

Coastal Archipelago Park of the South Coast ("Sørlandet") of Norway, colors at the shoreline (1)

Oceans & marine

Artificial downwelling

Oceans play an important role in global heat transfer and carbon storage processes. As global temperatures and atmospheric carbon levels rise, some have suggested artificially modifying the vertical movement of water to enhance these processes.

Nickel Smelters, Norilsk, Siberia, Russia

Industry

Carbon capture and storage

Both emission reductions and CDR measures that actively reduce carbon dioxide are essential to reduce the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere and mitigate the effects of climate change. However, some carbon emissions, especially in the industrial and energy sectors, will be difficult to fully decarbonise.

Industry

Methane flaring (not industrial)

Oceans & marine

Enhancing oceanic light availability below the photic layer

Ocean bioproductivity through photosynthesis stops beyond the photic layer as no more energy from the sun can penetrate beyond that point.

Clouds over Setesdalsheia, Norway, October 2013

Atmosphere / solar radiation

Cirrus cloud thinning

Cirrus clouds are high altitude ice clouds. They influence the Earth’s radiation budget as they reflect both incoming and outgoing radiation. However, they ultimately have a warming effect as they are more efficient at trapping outgoing longwave radiation (Kärcher 2017).

Cape Petrel (Daption capense), Antarctic Peninsula

Oceans & marine

Reflective foams and bubbles on oceans

Sea water has a low albedo of around 0.1 and therefore absorbs most of the incoming solar energy. Since water covers over two thirds of the Earth’s surface, changes to this albedo can potentially cause significant changes in global temperatures.

Industry

Radiative covering and building technologies/ Passive daytime radiative cooling

An increase in GHGs in the atmosphere leads to a greater amount of outgoing infrared radiation from the earth being retained. There are several ideas to reduce the resulting warming by modifying surface radiation processes.